One dashboard across 3PL client warehouses
Overview
Airodevs built a single fulfilment-reporting dashboard across a third-party logistics provider's client warehouses, each running its own mix of inbound, pick-pack and outbound workflows. Operations managers see pick accuracy, order cycle time and dock utilisation by client account in one place instead of pulling a separate report per warehouse management setup.
Client
A Quebec-based trucking and third-party logistics provider offering warehousing and freight services to manufacturing and retail clients, roughly 3,500 employees. Each client contract comes with its own service-level agreement for order accuracy and turnaround time, and warehouse staff juggle several clients' workflows inside the same building on a given shift.
Challenge
Each client account's fulfilment performance was reported differently, built from whatever extract that client's warehouse setup happened to produce, so comparing pick accuracy or cycle time across accounts meant manually rebuilding a spreadsheet every month. A client account quietly slipping below its service-level agreement often was not caught until the client raised it, because nobody had a standing view of performance by account.
Solution
We built a normalised reporting layer that pulls pick, pack and outbound event data from the warehouse management system across client accounts into one Supabase schema. Operations managers get a live dashboard of order cycle time, pick accuracy and dock utilisation by account, with a service-level agreement threshold marked on each chart so a slipping account is visible well before a client calls to ask about it.
Areas of Impact
Operations managers' daily account-performance reviews, the monthly service-level agreement reporting sent to clients, dock and labour scheduling across accounts sharing the same building, and new-account onboarding, where a client's performance now appears on the shared dashboard from its first week instead of after a separate reporting setup is built.
Results
accounts missing their monthly service-level target down from 17% -> 10% of accounts
average time to catch a dropping account down from 11 -> 2.3 days
manual report-building time per operations manager down from 6 -> 1 hour monthly
More Case Studies
Project inquiry
Tell us what needs to work better.
Share the workflow, product problem, or delivery pressure you want to improve. We'll respond with a clear next step.
What happens next
- Airodevs reviews the request.
- A short discovery call confirms scope and constraints.
- A concrete next step or proposal follows.
Toronto, Ontario
Canada